<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Campaign Finance Reform Center</title>
	<atom:link href="http://campaigncash.org/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://campaigncash.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 19:24:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Clean Elections</title>
		<link>http://campaigncash.org/?p=22</link>
		<comments>http://campaigncash.org/?p=22#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 18:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Our Platform for Reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigncash.org/?p=22</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As for this campaign finance reform proposal, each candidate choosing to participate will be given a certain amount of money. To be able to take part, candidates must be able to collect a certain number of signatures plus small contributions. Candidates cannot use their own money and accept donations from the outside once public funding is given to them. They can still accept matching funds given that their opponents are &#8230;<a class="excerpt" href="http://campaigncash.org/?p=22">Read More</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for this campaign finance reform proposal, each candidate choosing to participate will be given a certain amount of money. To be able to take part, candidates must be able to collect a certain number of signatures plus small contributions.</p>
<p><a href="http://campaigncash.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/arizona.png" data-rel="prettyPhoto[this_page]" title=""><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-23" title="arizona" src="http://campaigncash.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/arizona.png" alt="" width="151" height="157" /></a>Candidates cannot use their own money and accept donations from the outside once public funding is given to them. They can still accept matching funds given that their opponents are benefiting from independent expenditures, they are being attacked directly by independent expenditures, and they are being outspent by candidates that are privately funded.</p>
<p>However, limits will be set as to how much matching funds can be received. Nevertheless, this is why clean money financing systems are preferred over presidential campaign systems because the latter does not provide extra funding for candidates under attack.</p>
<p>Not to mention that Clean Elections levels the playing field, <a href="http://www.azcleanelections.gov/home.aspx">as seen in Arizona during its first year</a> of implementation, with disproportionate funding at just 2% in the electoral races between candidates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://campaigncash.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=22</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Matching Funds</title>
		<link>http://campaigncash.org/?p=20</link>
		<comments>http://campaigncash.org/?p=20#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 18:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Our Platform for Reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigncash.org/?p=20</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This campaign finance reform proposal allows candidates to raise the funds they need with the help of private donors but must provide matching funds for the first set of donations they receive. For example, the government will match the first $200 of each donation, effectively making small donations have more value to a campaign which may lead to more efforts directed towards pursuing small donations. Smaller donations are inherently less &#8230;<a class="excerpt" href="http://campaigncash.org/?p=20">Read More</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This campaign finance reform proposal allows candidates to raise the funds they need with the help of private donors but must provide matching funds for the first set of donations they receive. For example, the government will match the first $200 of each donation, effectively making small donations have more value to a campaign which may lead to more efforts directed towards pursuing small donations.</p>
<div id="attachment_26" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 435px"><img class="size-full wp-image-26" title="Europe coins on a table" src="http://campaigncash.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/money.jpg" alt="" width="425" height="282" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Dollar for Dollar Funds</p></div>
<p>Smaller donations are<a href="http://www.opm.gov/faqs/topic/cfc/index.aspx?cid=f934473a-08a8-420f-9033-b81736e53f0d"> inherently less corrupting</a> compared to larger donations so this is seen as a way to introduce reform as well as a means of enhancing power for people of less wealth. This reform plan is already in place but not everyone is sold on the matching funds system because some fear that it is being used as a safety net by losing candidates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://campaigncash.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=20</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Voting with dollars</title>
		<link>http://campaigncash.org/?p=18</link>
		<comments>http://campaigncash.org/?p=18#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 18:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Our Platform for Reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campaigncash.org/?p=18</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This campaign finance reform proposal calls for establishing a modified public finance system in conjunction with developing a process for campaign contributions that is anonymous. Voting with dollars will have two parts: patriot dollars and a secret donation booth. Much of the details about voting for dollars are contained in a book of the same title released in 2004 by Ian Ayres and Bruce Ackerman, professors in Yale Law School. &#8230;<a class="excerpt" href="http://campaigncash.org/?p=18">Read More</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-full wp-image-29 alignright" title="Success" src="http://campaigncash.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/dollar.jpg" alt="" width="283" height="424" />This campaign finance reform proposal calls for establishing a modified public finance system in conjunction with developing a process for campaign contributions that is anonymous. Voting with dollars will have two parts: patriot dollars and a secret donation booth. Much of the details about voting for dollars are contained in a book of the same title released in 2004 by Ian Ayres and Bruce Ackerman, professors in <a href="http://www.yale.edu">Yale Law School</a>.</p>
<p>Voting by dollars states that all voters will be given <strong>publicly funded vouchers</strong> worth $50 (<a href="http://www.law.yale.edu/news/4620.htm">patriot dollars</a>) that they can donate to political campaigns. The voucher can be split so it is possible for voters to donate to several campaigns of their choosing. All the donations, both the voucher and private contributions, will have to be done anonymously though through the Federal Election Commission.</p>
<p>The book by Ayres and Ackerman also includes model legislation on top of detailed discussions on how the voting with dollars system is to be achieved as well as the system’s legal foundations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://campaigncash.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=18</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
